Folks, the point of an opt-in unstable beta is feedback, not butthurt, and not downvoting every critical thought

If it helps clarify:

Toxic butthurt = "This game is over 10 years old and this unstable beta consisting of a metric butt-ton of changes they warned me weren't final in multiple screens I opted into still isn't balanced!" "Everything's being rebalanced for multiplayer like it's an MMO and I'm not going to explain how exactly!" "I can't believe they implemented this brand new thing and it's not perfect!"

Overdefensive fanboyism = *downvotes without comment *suggests sandbox settings when criticism is about default difficulty *complains about complaining

Legit criticism = "I get why they did this but I don't know why they did that." "I find this particular change unfun." "This specific thing makes the default game way too challenging for newer players" "I hope this particular thing is an unintended bug because I don't like it for these reasons." "These once very rare things are now damned-near impossible to find." "This bug is hilarious, but hope it gets fixed next patch."